"B" <blimpie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e7b82e09-29c8-4fcd-ac09-f152de5498dd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jun 3, 8:39 pm, "Peter Masson" <peter.mass...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Joe Curry" <e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:5t3b44l1kl9da324g40vacq5lr8rdkb9dc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:26:42 +0100, Jim Mason
> > <jim.ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >> > Straightening out the curves North of Newcastle will improve
times
> > >> > on Kings X - Edinburgh?
>
> > >> And it will never happen. It's far too expensive - if they are
going
> > >> to spend mega-bucks on the ECML there are plenty of more worthy
> > >> candidates, such as the Welwyn viaduct.
>
> > >The ECML is as fast as it is likely to get IMO. The speed gains are
> > >more
> > >likely to happen on the WCML.
>
> > A matter of opinion surely? The ECML does not have the geographical
> > challenges of the WCML.?
>
> The best way of reducing journey times on the ECML would be to increase
> the
> permitted speed to 140 or even 155 mph where possible south of
Darlington.
> This would benefit London to Leeds and Newcastle passengers, as well as
> those travelling through to Scotland. Increasing permitted speeds north
of
> Newcastle would benefit far fewer passengers.
>Except those heading for Glasgow, the terminus, Waverley being just an
>intermediate stop en-route to Scotlands busiest main line station.
But not Scotland's busiest InterCity station ... I believe we had that
conversation a few years back? ;-)
|
