On 4 Jun, 19:43, GKirk <grahamkirk1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 3 Jun, 22:29, "Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "B" <blim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:e7b82e09-29c8-4fcd-ac09-f152de5498dd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Jun 3, 8:39 pm, "Peter Masson" <peter.mass...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > "Joe Curry" <e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > >news:5t3b44l1kl9da324g40vacq5lr8rdkb9dc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:26:42 +0100, Jim Mason
> > > > <jim.ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > >> > Straightening out the curves North of Newcastle will improve
times
> > > > >> > on Kings X - Edinburgh?
>
> > > > >> And it will never happen. It's far too expensive - if they are
going
> > > > >> to spend mega-bucks on the ECML there are plenty of more worthy
> > > > >> candidates, such as the Welwyn viaduct.
>
> > > > >The ECML is as fast as it is likely to get IMO. The speed gains
are
> > > > >more
> > > > >likely to happen on the WCML.
>
> > > > A matter of opinion surely? The ECML does not have the
geographical
> > > > challenges of the WCML.?
>
> > > The best way of reducing journey times on the ECML would be to
increase
> > > the
> > > permitted speed to 140 or even 155 mph where possible south of
Darlington.
> > > This would benefit London to Leeds and Newcastle passengers, as well
as
> > > those travelling through to Scotland. Increasing permitted speeds
north of
> > > Newcastle would benefit far fewer passengers.
> > >Except those heading for Glasgow, the terminus, Waverley being just
an
> > >intermediate stop en-route to Scotlands busiest main line station.
>
> > But not Scotland's busiest InterCity station ... I believe we had that
> > conversation a few years back? ;-)
>
> Surely you'd have to consider Glasgow Central and Queen Street as one,
> the same with Waverly and Haymarket? ;-)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Queen Street doesn't have InterCity service.
|
