Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Hot air balloons, gas balloons, airships > Re: Homebuilt h...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 10 Topic 119 of 169
Post > Topic >>

Re: Homebuilt hot-air air****ps

by Jim Logajan <JamesL@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 20, 2006 at 05:55 PM

Dan Nachbar of Skyacht sent the following e-mail to me in response to my 
posting to these groups (rec.aviation.balloon and 
rec.aviation.homebuilt). Please note that he refers to some attached 
photos he included in his e-mail, but since these are text-only groups, I 
am not able to include them.

=== Text of message from Dan Nachbar:

Greetings.

Somebody pointed me to the discussion of our project on
the rec.aviation.homebuilt group at google.
Feel free to forward this message to the group.

You are correct, we are raising the profile of the project a bit.
Although, this change wasn't part of our plans.

Our plan was to have the ****p flying before the big Oshkosh
air show (next week.)  But record rains here in the Northeast have
delayed our work by about 3 months.  So the ****p won't be at Oshkosh.
Unfortunately, I had to sign up to give a talk there long ago -- before
it was clear that the ****p wouldn't be ready.  So I'm with stuck with
the commitment to give the talk, even without a ****p to show.
I guess our days of operating in "stealth mode" are about to come
to an end and I expect to be met with a good bit of skepticism.

And such skepticism is well placed. Most "great new
aircraft ideas" have a very high hype-to-aircraft ratio.  That's
exactly why we've been keeping such a low profile.  Most serious
folks, with good reason, won't take any new idea seriously until
it's off the ground.

We have in fact been off the ground, albeit on a tether,
a fair number of times this year.  We're still tuning
the longitudinal balance and load-suspension system, so the
****p isn't ready for free flight testing just yet.  We'll get to
that point in August.

I appreciate the comment about the less-than-convincing photos
on the project website.  I hadn't realized how far the pictures there
had fallen behind our actual progress. I've attached a couple of
shots that show the ****p off the ground. You can see one fellow
acting as ballast on a line on the nose, a pile of sandbags in the
cabin, the cabin is tipped at a bit of an angle and the fact that
the bottom of the ****p is distinctly flatter than the top. These are
the sorts of things that we are working on before we can start
free flights.

I'll be updating the website photos soon.

Regards,
Dan Nachbar
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
Homebuilt hot-air airships
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2006-07-19 01:35:00 
Re: Homebuilt hot-air airships
fredfighter@[EMAIL PROTEC  2006-07-18 20:39:30 
Re: Homebuilt hot-air airships
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2006-07-19 04:24:07 
Re: Homebuilt hot-air airships
john smith <jsmith@[EM  2006-07-19 12:28:29 
Re: Homebuilt hot-air airships
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2006-07-19 16:28:29 
Re: Homebuilt hot-air airships
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2006-07-20 17:55:17 
Re: Homebuilt hot-air airships
john smith <jsmith@[EM  2006-07-20 18:36:43 
Re: Homebuilt hot-air airships
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2006-07-20 19:28:04 
Re: Homebuilt hot-air airships
"Rich S." <c  2006-07-20 14:18:11 
Re: Homebuilt hot-air airships
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2006-07-21 17:49:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 21:19:23 CST 2008.