Re: Venus Air****ps / by Brad Guth

On Jul 3, 8:19 am, BradGuth <bradg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jun 30, 7:19 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 30, 6:58 am, "Hagar" <ha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > "BradGuth" <bradg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >
>news:ddea380a-c7d7-46c8-bc78-513a66ad21db@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > On Jun 18, 3:32 pm, dean...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > > >> On Jun 17, 10:13 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > snip drivel <
> > > > Sorry I'd missed this reply of yours.
>
> > > > All that I'm saying is that a sufficient composite rigid air****p
can
> > > > be created for at least robotics to stay aloft for months and even
> > > > years while cruising efficiently below them acidic clouds of
Venus.
>
> > > Yearning for those good old Horse and Buggy days, Bradwurst ??
>
> > As long as those are not Zionist/Nazi horse and buggy days, why the
> > hell not.
>
> > Just wondering, what's horse and buggy about a composite rigid air****p
> > as intended for the planet Venus?
>
> > Isn't this just another topic diversion tactic of yours?  But then,
> > isn't this exactly what being a brown-nosed minion/clown for the
> > Zionist Third Reich is all about?
>
> > - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
>
> For such a downright nifty R&D topic, seems a touch odd that our all-
> knowing public servants of DARPA haven't been into helping out.   What
> the hell is it about Venus that's so unusually dark and scary?
>
> - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

Notice how the DARPA resident rabbi is into topic/author stalking and
trying to continually trash this topic.
 - BG