by "Stuart & Kathryn Fields" <sfkf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jun 26, 2008 at 11:29 AM
"ChuckSlusarczyk" <ChuckSlusarczyk_member@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:g401hl01200@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <uYWdnU_lWKnPUcLVnZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Stuart &
Kathryn
> Fields says...
>>
>>I posted a notice about our A.N.N interview and expected at least some
>>response and probably a shower of stuff about ZZZZ, who BTW I've never
>>met,
>>but nothing. ???? Has the ZZZZ stuff run it's course?
>>Stu
>
> Because of the lack of credibility of zoom ,his staff and ANN I tend to
> treat
> all articles as suspect. Since I neither knew the interviewer or the
> interviewe(s) except for seeing the names on RAH I had litle interest in
> the
> piece.However most of his writers seem to be honest at first and either
go
> to
> the dark side or learn about zoom and bail out.
> Rest assured if zoom lies I'll be the first to call him on it :-) Being
> interviewed by ANN is not something I'd brag about ...but that's just me
> :-)
>
>
> Chuck S RAH 14/1 ret
Thanks for the feed back and opinions. We will watch and see what comes
out
of the interview.
Stu
