Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Homebuilt airplanes > Re: Too Old?
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 91 of 189 Topic 4213 of 4390
Post > Topic >>

Re: Too Old?

by Dudley Henriques <dhenriques@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 3, 2008 at 06:40 PM

Viperdoc wrote:
> Dudley:
> 
> The OP is not at the mercy of a physician in the group- he simply could
go 
> elsewhere to get his FCIII exam performed. However, it sounds like he
needs 
> a complete new physical, a review of the records, and a submission via 
> computer on a regular basis for the special issuance.
> 
> Unfortunately, this all takes a fair amount of time. Performing the
required 
> tests, especially Class II, requires an EKG, hearing test, vision
screening, 
> etc, and between the equipment and time required this adds up to a lot
of 
> expense. Then, you, or a paid assistant, has to log onto the FAA
computer 
> and submit all of this stuff.
> 
> A special issuance requires an extensive review of records, along with 
> dictation of a letter (that has to be done by a paid transcriptionist)
and 
> then submission to the FAA.
> 
> Most docs actually barely break even or lose money doing this service
for 
> pilots.
> 
> So, yes, it's expensive, but so are a lot of other aspects of flying. I 
> personally would rather have someone identify a potential problem and 
> address the issue, rather than keep on flying until something breaks,
just 
> as if my mechanic found some potential problem that would ultimately
save 
> money or my life down the line.
> 
> 
> 
> "Dudley Henriques" <dhenriques@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:DLOdnVDgkIfmICDVnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> John Godwin wrote:
>>> Dudley Henriques <dhenriques@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>> news:TNydnYotDqHZLSDVnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Make sure we're on the same page with the above. I might not have
>>>> stated this as accurately as I should have,
>>>> What I'm saying doesn't conflict with the Pass= fly regardless of
>>>> age. It simply RECOGNIZES that at a certain point while following
>>>> the "plan", a pilot WILL reach a specific point in time where the
>>>> medical can no longer be passed. In other words, Fail= no longer
>>>> fly. What I'm saying is simply that even my "plan" so to speak,
>>>> ends up with basically what we have now :-)) You fly until you
>>>> can't pass the physical then no more. The same issue remains. The
>>>> "rub" is that no matter what is done, the end of the road seems
>>>> unchanged. There can very well be a point where the pilot p*****
>>>> the physical at some ripe old age, then has that heart attack in
>>>> the air during the periods between physicals.
>>>> This is the basis for what I have envisioned as a "plan" to
>>>> shorten the period between physicals as a pilot ages.
>>> My situation is one of cost.  I can easily pass the FAA Medical (even
at 
>>> my age) but have decided not to try after passing my last one.
>>>
>>> I have a Special Issuance wherein the FAA required do***entation from 
>>> each of my two physicians.  My Medical Group charges nearly $100 per 
>>> "official" letter and then there's the AME fee.  I felt that a little 
>>> under $300 each year was a tad much at this time so it may well be
that 
>>> it's time to hang up the spurs or do other flying alternatives.
>> That's a CRIME. I'm VERY sorry this is happening to you. I never quite 
>> know what to do or say when I see things like this happening to a
pilot. 
>> We're at the mercy of these damn doctors and they know it. You could 
>> complain, but many times that simply ends up in an endless loop that
goes 
>> nowhere. Charging $100 to fill out a form is a gross over charge and
the 
>> only reason they can get away with it is because you HAVE to have it.
>> This doctor could easily have been a lawyer!
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Dudley Henriques 
> 
> 
I understand, and in an ideal world what you have stated would indeed be 
the case.
My experience with some of these doctors personally and with some of my 
students unfortunately hasn't exactly mirrored your own. :-))


-- 
Dudley Henriques
 




 189 Posts in Topic:
Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-08-31 16:13:15 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-31 20:25:08 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:12:54 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 17:35:05 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 17:13:33 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 21:55:05 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:44:55 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 18:35:04 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 17:08:41 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 21:55:06 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike Isaksen"   2008-09-01 22:25:37 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 14:00:15 
Re: Too Old?
"Wayne Paul" &l  2008-09-01 21:29:23 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 14:04:01 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-01 22:24:09 
Re: Too Old?
stuff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-10-13 03:30:06 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-08-31 23:18:40 
Re: Too Old?
"Ramsey" <@[  2008-08-31 16:19:51 
Re: Too Old?
gorgon <gorgonc3@[EMAI  2008-08-31 14:35:02 
Re: Too Old?
"Ramsey" <@[  2008-08-31 16:43:55 
Re: Too Old?
Lou <loupark@[EMAIL PR  2008-08-31 14:52:03 
Re: Too Old?
"Ramsey" <@[  2008-08-31 20:51:33 
Re: Too Old?
Stella Starr <none@[EM  2008-08-31 21:39:17 
Re: Too Old?
"Zebulon" <@  2008-08-31 23:51:42 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-08-31 18:12:33 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:14:50 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 12:19:41 
Re: Too Old?
JohnO <johno1234@[EMAI  2008-08-31 19:18:14 
Re: Too Old?
Lou <loupark@[EMAIL PR  2008-09-01 02:37:16 
Re: Too Old?
"Zebulon" <@  2008-09-01 08:07:23 
Re: Too Old?
Cubdriver <usenet AT d  2008-09-01 19:22:54 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-02 01:58:35 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 20:09:34 
Re: Too Old?
Steve Hix <sehix@[EMAI  2008-09-01 18:25:18 
Re: Too Old?
David Lesher <wb8foz@[  2008-09-20 22:43:14 
Re: Too Old?
Lou <loupark@[EMAIL PR  2008-09-01 16:34:26 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 18:34:22 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-03 09:42:39 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-08-31 17:43:45 
Re: Too Old?
a <pappson@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-31 14:52:41 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-01 01:11:32 
Re: Too Old?
Orval Fairbairn <o_r_f  2008-08-31 23:40:14 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-08-31 23:48:38 
Re: Too Old?
"Ben Jeffrey" &  2008-09-01 17:20:14 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-01 13:30:50 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 17:15:28 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-01 17:36:28 
Re: Too Old?
"Stuart & Kathry  2008-09-01 14:58:12 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:31:30 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 16:24:08 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike" <nosp  2008-09-03 02:04:14 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 00:03:36 
Re: Too Old?
Steve Hix <sehix@[EMAI  2008-09-03 10:31:30 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:30:13 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-02 17:32:15 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 21:55:06 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:38:19 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-02 20:55:05 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 20:06:53 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 01:05:06 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 12:39:17 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 15:55:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:49:00 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 04:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-01 04:23:01 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 15:29:19 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:44:07 
Re: Too Old?
JG <jgrove24@[EMAIL PR  2008-09-14 12:26:14 
Re: Too Old?
K l e i n <kleing@[EMA  2008-09-01 17:08:23 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-01 20:44:51 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:36:01 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-02 17:29:39 
Re: Too Old?
John Godwin <News@[EMA  2008-09-02 21:51:48 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 17:16:11 
Re: Too Old?
Pietro <PietroL@[EMAIL  2008-09-03 05:11:56 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 23:33:20 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-02 18:26:03 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 12:37:53 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-03 07:13:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:46:12 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-04 07:53:10 
Re: Too Old?
Andy Hawkins <andy@[EM  2008-09-04 13:02:56 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-04 08:41:57 
Re: Too Old?
Gig 601Xl Builder <wrg  2008-09-03 08:02:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:46:44 
Re: Too Old?
"John" <jthe  2008-09-04 04:02:17 
Re: Too Old?
Gig 601Xl Builder <wrg  2008-09-04 08:52:51 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 15:45:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-03 07:23:46 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 13:10:13 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-03 18:40:16 
Re: Too Old?
David Lesher <wb8foz@[  2008-09-20 22:48:11 
Re: Too Old?
Stealth Pilot <notrans  2008-09-21 11:27:56 
Re: Too Old?
"Mick" <#$$#  2008-09-21 22:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Morgans" <j  2008-09-02 20:49:07 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-03 09:20:11 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike" <nosp  2008-09-03 15:08:12 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike Isaksen"   2008-09-03 17:57:53 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike" <nosp  2008-09-03 19:31:28 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-03 20:02:14 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 00:04:38 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 12:35:44 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-03 07:14:02 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 15:45:06 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-04 17:06:42 
Re: Too Old?
stuff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-10-13 03:45:52 
Re: Too Old?
Ricky <jesusisbetter@[  2008-09-01 17:51:41 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-02 12:42:11 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 06:03:41 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 23:55:39 
Re: Too Old?
"Ol Shy & Bashfu  2008-08-31 19:53:20 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-08-31 23:21:49 
Re: Too Old?
"RST Engineering&quo  2008-09-01 08:53:30 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:09:52 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-01 22:25:25 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 20:55:04 
Re: Too Old?
w <loverlyvagina@[EMAI  2008-09-01 17:28:09 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-02 02:01:10 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 20:10:54 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-02 01:45:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-02 06:46:56 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-02 05:05:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 06:02:42 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 04:45:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:59:53 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 04:35:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 19:43:28 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 18:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:03:30 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:18:53 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:06:02 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-05 06:20:25 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:18:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-05 06:21:51 
Re: Too Old?
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-09-05 06:10:11 
Re: Too Old?
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-09-04 09:40:02 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 15:15:04 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-04 16:56:15 
Re: Too Old?
yaeedyaeegiisss <daige  2008-09-04 11:16:31 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-05 13:41:40 
Re: Too Old?
a <pappson@[EMAIL PROT  2008-09-05 16:50:10 
Re: Too Old?
george <gblack@[EMAIL   2008-09-05 13:22:53 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-01 20:59:35 
Re: Too Old?
BobR <reed1@[EMAIL PRO  2008-09-04 14:58:50 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 22:35:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 17:51:55 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:07:59 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:14:17 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 05:57:44 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:35:06 
Re: Too Old?
Gig 601Xl Builder <wrg  2008-09-05 08:08:10 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 00:25:08 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 01:15:07 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 01:19:50 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 21:02:55 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:01:10 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 16:02:22 
Re: Too Old?
"Tim" <skyhi  2008-09-05 10:17:25 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 21:15:07 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 19:35:04 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 19:36:51 
Re: Too Old?
"Peter Dohm" &l  2008-09-05 18:59:26 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-05 18:18:07 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 16:45:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 21:15:32 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 19:35:05 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 19:37:24 
Re: Too Old?
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-09-04 21:40:38 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:11:09 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:05:31 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:04:45 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-05 06:19:00 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 11:25:20 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:06:59 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:16:07 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:35:07 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-05 18:19:06 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:05:10 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Ricky <jesusisbetter@[  2008-09-01 17:52:52 
Re: Too Old?
"Ol Shy & Bashfu  2008-09-01 19:32:20 
Re: Too Old?
george <gblack@[EMAIL   2008-09-02 13:39:35 
Re: Too Old?
"Steve Foley" &  2008-09-02 13:35:10 
Re: Too Old?
"Chris J" <c  2008-09-03 00:23:04 
Re: Too Old?
"Peter Dohm" &l  2008-09-03 06:53:25 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 13:15:52 
Re: Too Old?
Mike Spera <mwspera@[E  2008-10-04 08:27:13 
Re: Too Old?
"Wayne Paul" &l  2008-10-04 10:04:19 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 17:34:03 CST 2008.