Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Homebuilt airplanes > Re: Too Old?
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 155 of 189 Topic 4213 of 4390
Post > Topic >>

Re: Too Old?

by Bertie the Bunyip <AA@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 5, 2008 at 01:19 AM

jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote in news:pnd6p5-nt5.ln1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In rec.aviation.owning Bertie the Bunyip <AA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote in news:0046p5-c0p.ln1
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>>> In rec.aviation.owning BobR <reed1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> On Sep 4, 1:25?pm, j...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>> In rec.aviation.owning Mxsmanic <mxsma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > j...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> >> As for smoking, that is utter, pulled out of your ass, 
nonsense.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Not when the air is thin.
>>>>>
>>>>> More ignorant nonsense; if it were true about half the population 
of
>>>>> Peru would be incapacitated.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jim Pennino
>>>>>
>>>>> Remove .spam.sux to reply.
>>>> 
>>>> Your knowledge of this subject is so seriously limited that you
>>>> really need to drop out of the discussion before you make yourself
>>>> look really stupid.  The people of Peru who live at high altitudes
>>>> have become acclimated to the altitude and are not as subject to
>>>> altitude sickness as those who live at lower altitudes.  Smoking 
has
>>>> the direct effect of dimini****ng the ability of the lungs to absorb
>>>> oxygen which becomes especially critical at higher altitudes. 
>>>> Smokers who are not acclimated to the altitude and who take off 
from
>>>> lower altitudes and asscend to altitude can easily become oxygen
>>>> starved resulting in numerous possible medical problems.
>>> 
>>> Point totally missed.
>>> 
>>> 1) No one becomes "immediately incapacitated", whatever that means,
>>> from smoking.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Depends on what you mean by that. Smoking will exacerbate any 
situation 
>> where breathing sails close to the edge, like a sudden loss of 
>> pressurisation or if the individual has been comprimised and 
breathing 
>> becomes difficult. Like someone who has been badly inured and is 
>> comatose. All other factors being equal, if the individual has been 
>> pushed to the edge in a situation like this, a history of smoking 
will 
>> push them over it. 
> 
> And in what kind of situation is any of that likely to happen to a
> private pilot? 
> 

Well, there are a lot of private pilots operating airplanes at high 
altitudes these days. 
Leaving that aside, my intention as to highlight the damage done and how 
that can comprimise someone operating at or near their limit. It's 
something else stacked against you in a bad situation. .

What do peruvian mountain dwellers have to do with private pilots?
 




 189 Posts in Topic:
Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-08-31 16:13:15 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-31 20:25:08 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:12:54 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 17:35:05 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 17:13:33 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 21:55:05 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:44:55 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 18:35:04 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 17:08:41 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 21:55:06 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike Isaksen"   2008-09-01 22:25:37 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 14:00:15 
Re: Too Old?
"Wayne Paul" &l  2008-09-01 21:29:23 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 14:04:01 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-01 22:24:09 
Re: Too Old?
stuff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-10-13 03:30:06 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-08-31 23:18:40 
Re: Too Old?
"Ramsey" <@[  2008-08-31 16:19:51 
Re: Too Old?
gorgon <gorgonc3@[EMAI  2008-08-31 14:35:02 
Re: Too Old?
"Ramsey" <@[  2008-08-31 16:43:55 
Re: Too Old?
Lou <loupark@[EMAIL PR  2008-08-31 14:52:03 
Re: Too Old?
"Ramsey" <@[  2008-08-31 20:51:33 
Re: Too Old?
Stella Starr <none@[EM  2008-08-31 21:39:17 
Re: Too Old?
"Zebulon" <@  2008-08-31 23:51:42 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-08-31 18:12:33 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:14:50 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 12:19:41 
Re: Too Old?
JohnO <johno1234@[EMAI  2008-08-31 19:18:14 
Re: Too Old?
Lou <loupark@[EMAIL PR  2008-09-01 02:37:16 
Re: Too Old?
"Zebulon" <@  2008-09-01 08:07:23 
Re: Too Old?
Cubdriver <usenet AT d  2008-09-01 19:22:54 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-02 01:58:35 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 20:09:34 
Re: Too Old?
Steve Hix <sehix@[EMAI  2008-09-01 18:25:18 
Re: Too Old?
David Lesher <wb8foz@[  2008-09-20 22:43:14 
Re: Too Old?
Lou <loupark@[EMAIL PR  2008-09-01 16:34:26 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 18:34:22 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-03 09:42:39 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-08-31 17:43:45 
Re: Too Old?
a <pappson@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-31 14:52:41 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-01 01:11:32 
Re: Too Old?
Orval Fairbairn <o_r_f  2008-08-31 23:40:14 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-08-31 23:48:38 
Re: Too Old?
"Ben Jeffrey" &  2008-09-01 17:20:14 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-01 13:30:50 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 17:15:28 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-01 17:36:28 
Re: Too Old?
"Stuart & Kathry  2008-09-01 14:58:12 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:31:30 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 16:24:08 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike" <nosp  2008-09-03 02:04:14 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 00:03:36 
Re: Too Old?
Steve Hix <sehix@[EMAI  2008-09-03 10:31:30 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:30:13 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-02 17:32:15 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 21:55:06 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:38:19 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-02 20:55:05 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 20:06:53 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 01:05:06 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 12:39:17 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 15:55:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:49:00 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 04:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-01 04:23:01 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 15:29:19 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:44:07 
Re: Too Old?
JG <jgrove24@[EMAIL PR  2008-09-14 12:26:14 
Re: Too Old?
K l e i n <kleing@[EMA  2008-09-01 17:08:23 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-01 20:44:51 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:36:01 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-02 17:29:39 
Re: Too Old?
John Godwin <News@[EMA  2008-09-02 21:51:48 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 17:16:11 
Re: Too Old?
Pietro <PietroL@[EMAIL  2008-09-03 05:11:56 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 23:33:20 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-02 18:26:03 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 12:37:53 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-03 07:13:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:46:12 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-04 07:53:10 
Re: Too Old?
Andy Hawkins <andy@[EM  2008-09-04 13:02:56 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-04 08:41:57 
Re: Too Old?
Gig 601Xl Builder <wrg  2008-09-03 08:02:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:46:44 
Re: Too Old?
"John" <jthe  2008-09-04 04:02:17 
Re: Too Old?
Gig 601Xl Builder <wrg  2008-09-04 08:52:51 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 15:45:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-03 07:23:46 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 13:10:13 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-03 18:40:16 
Re: Too Old?
David Lesher <wb8foz@[  2008-09-20 22:48:11 
Re: Too Old?
Stealth Pilot <notrans  2008-09-21 11:27:56 
Re: Too Old?
"Mick" <#$$#  2008-09-21 22:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Morgans" <j  2008-09-02 20:49:07 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-03 09:20:11 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike" <nosp  2008-09-03 15:08:12 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike Isaksen"   2008-09-03 17:57:53 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike" <nosp  2008-09-03 19:31:28 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-03 20:02:14 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 00:04:38 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 12:35:44 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-03 07:14:02 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 15:45:06 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-04 17:06:42 
Re: Too Old?
stuff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-10-13 03:45:52 
Re: Too Old?
Ricky <jesusisbetter@[  2008-09-01 17:51:41 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-02 12:42:11 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 06:03:41 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 23:55:39 
Re: Too Old?
"Ol Shy & Bashfu  2008-08-31 19:53:20 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-08-31 23:21:49 
Re: Too Old?
"RST Engineering&quo  2008-09-01 08:53:30 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:09:52 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-01 22:25:25 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 20:55:04 
Re: Too Old?
w <loverlyvagina@[EMAI  2008-09-01 17:28:09 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-02 02:01:10 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 20:10:54 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-02 01:45:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-02 06:46:56 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-02 05:05:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 06:02:42 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 04:45:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:59:53 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 04:35:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 19:43:28 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 18:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:03:30 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:18:53 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:06:02 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-05 06:20:25 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:18:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-05 06:21:51 
Re: Too Old?
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-09-05 06:10:11 
Re: Too Old?
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-09-04 09:40:02 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 15:15:04 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-04 16:56:15 
Re: Too Old?
yaeedyaeegiisss <daige  2008-09-04 11:16:31 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-05 13:41:40 
Re: Too Old?
a <pappson@[EMAIL PROT  2008-09-05 16:50:10 
Re: Too Old?
george <gblack@[EMAIL   2008-09-05 13:22:53 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-01 20:59:35 
Re: Too Old?
BobR <reed1@[EMAIL PRO  2008-09-04 14:58:50 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 22:35:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 17:51:55 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:07:59 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:14:17 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 05:57:44 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:35:06 
Re: Too Old?
Gig 601Xl Builder <wrg  2008-09-05 08:08:10 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 00:25:08 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 01:15:07 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 01:19:50 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 21:02:55 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:01:10 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 16:02:22 
Re: Too Old?
"Tim" <skyhi  2008-09-05 10:17:25 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 21:15:07 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 19:35:04 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 19:36:51 
Re: Too Old?
"Peter Dohm" &l  2008-09-05 18:59:26 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-05 18:18:07 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 16:45:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 21:15:32 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 19:35:05 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 19:37:24 
Re: Too Old?
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-09-04 21:40:38 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:11:09 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:05:31 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:04:45 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-05 06:19:00 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 11:25:20 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:06:59 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:16:07 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:35:07 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-05 18:19:06 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:05:10 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Ricky <jesusisbetter@[  2008-09-01 17:52:52 
Re: Too Old?
"Ol Shy & Bashfu  2008-09-01 19:32:20 
Re: Too Old?
george <gblack@[EMAIL   2008-09-02 13:39:35 
Re: Too Old?
"Steve Foley" &  2008-09-02 13:35:10 
Re: Too Old?
"Chris J" <c  2008-09-03 00:23:04 
Re: Too Old?
"Peter Dohm" &l  2008-09-03 06:53:25 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 13:15:52 
Re: Too Old?
Mike Spera <mwspera@[E  2008-10-04 08:27:13 
Re: Too Old?
"Wayne Paul" &l  2008-10-04 10:04:19 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 16:46:23 CST 2008.