Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Homebuilt airplanes > Re: Too Old?
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 175 of 189 Topic 4213 of 4390
Post > Topic >>

Re: Too Old?

by Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 5, 2008 at 05:06 AM

jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:

> 1) No one becomes "immediately incapacitated", whatever that means,
> from smoking.

A heart attack is immediately incapacitating, and smoking dramatically
increases the likelihood of a heart attack (something that the FAA
ignores).

> 2) If smoking were "immediately incapacitating" from an altitude change,
> every ski resort would be littered with bodies.

High-altitude ski resorts have their share of problems with people who
develop
altitude sickness, and many people without frank symptoms of illness still
are
far from being in top form at altitude.

> 3) Everyone becomes oxygen starved as altitude increases. For the
average
> heavy smoker that will happen at a lower altitude than for the average
> non-smoker.

Yes.  And so will the consequences.

> 4) Oxygen starvation doesn't result in medical problems, it causes
> phyisological problems that are eliminated by increased oxygen.

Same thing.  Not all of the problems can be fixed by increased oxygen, but
usually that helps.
 




 189 Posts in Topic:
Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-08-31 16:13:15 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-08-31 20:25:08 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:12:54 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 17:35:05 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 17:13:33 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 21:55:05 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:44:55 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 18:35:04 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 17:08:41 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 21:55:06 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike Isaksen"   2008-09-01 22:25:37 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 14:00:15 
Re: Too Old?
"Wayne Paul" &l  2008-09-01 21:29:23 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 14:04:01 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-01 22:24:09 
Re: Too Old?
stuff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-10-13 03:30:06 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-08-31 23:18:40 
Re: Too Old?
"Ramsey" <@[  2008-08-31 16:19:51 
Re: Too Old?
gorgon <gorgonc3@[EMAI  2008-08-31 14:35:02 
Re: Too Old?
"Ramsey" <@[  2008-08-31 16:43:55 
Re: Too Old?
Lou <loupark@[EMAIL PR  2008-08-31 14:52:03 
Re: Too Old?
"Ramsey" <@[  2008-08-31 20:51:33 
Re: Too Old?
Stella Starr <none@[EM  2008-08-31 21:39:17 
Re: Too Old?
"Zebulon" <@  2008-08-31 23:51:42 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-08-31 18:12:33 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:14:50 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 12:19:41 
Re: Too Old?
JohnO <johno1234@[EMAI  2008-08-31 19:18:14 
Re: Too Old?
Lou <loupark@[EMAIL PR  2008-09-01 02:37:16 
Re: Too Old?
"Zebulon" <@  2008-09-01 08:07:23 
Re: Too Old?
Cubdriver <usenet AT d  2008-09-01 19:22:54 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-02 01:58:35 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 20:09:34 
Re: Too Old?
Steve Hix <sehix@[EMAI  2008-09-01 18:25:18 
Re: Too Old?
David Lesher <wb8foz@[  2008-09-20 22:43:14 
Re: Too Old?
Lou <loupark@[EMAIL PR  2008-09-01 16:34:26 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 18:34:22 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-03 09:42:39 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-08-31 17:43:45 
Re: Too Old?
a <pappson@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-31 14:52:41 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-01 01:11:32 
Re: Too Old?
Orval Fairbairn <o_r_f  2008-08-31 23:40:14 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-08-31 23:48:38 
Re: Too Old?
"Ben Jeffrey" &  2008-09-01 17:20:14 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-01 13:30:50 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 17:15:28 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-01 17:36:28 
Re: Too Old?
"Stuart & Kathry  2008-09-01 14:58:12 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:31:30 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 16:24:08 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike" <nosp  2008-09-03 02:04:14 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 00:03:36 
Re: Too Old?
Steve Hix <sehix@[EMAI  2008-09-03 10:31:30 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:30:13 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-02 17:32:15 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 21:55:06 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:38:19 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-02 20:55:05 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 20:06:53 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 01:05:06 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 12:39:17 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 15:55:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:49:00 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 04:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-01 04:23:01 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 15:29:19 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:44:07 
Re: Too Old?
JG <jgrove24@[EMAIL PR  2008-09-14 12:26:14 
Re: Too Old?
K l e i n <kleing@[EMA  2008-09-01 17:08:23 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-01 20:44:51 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-02 16:36:01 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-02 17:29:39 
Re: Too Old?
John Godwin <News@[EMA  2008-09-02 21:51:48 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 17:16:11 
Re: Too Old?
Pietro <PietroL@[EMAIL  2008-09-03 05:11:56 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 23:33:20 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-02 18:26:03 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 12:37:53 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-03 07:13:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:46:12 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-04 07:53:10 
Re: Too Old?
Andy Hawkins <andy@[EM  2008-09-04 13:02:56 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-04 08:41:57 
Re: Too Old?
Gig 601Xl Builder <wrg  2008-09-03 08:02:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:46:44 
Re: Too Old?
"John" <jthe  2008-09-04 04:02:17 
Re: Too Old?
Gig 601Xl Builder <wrg  2008-09-04 08:52:51 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 15:45:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-03 07:23:46 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 13:10:13 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-09-03 18:40:16 
Re: Too Old?
David Lesher <wb8foz@[  2008-09-20 22:48:11 
Re: Too Old?
Stealth Pilot <notrans  2008-09-21 11:27:56 
Re: Too Old?
"Mick" <#$$#  2008-09-21 22:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Morgans" <j  2008-09-02 20:49:07 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-03 09:20:11 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike" <nosp  2008-09-03 15:08:12 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike Isaksen"   2008-09-03 17:57:53 
Re: Too Old?
"Mike" <nosp  2008-09-03 19:31:28 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-03 20:02:14 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 00:04:38 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 12:35:44 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-03 07:14:02 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 15:45:06 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-04 17:06:42 
Re: Too Old?
stuff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-10-13 03:45:52 
Re: Too Old?
Ricky <jesusisbetter@[  2008-09-01 17:51:41 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-02 12:42:11 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 06:03:41 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-02 23:55:39 
Re: Too Old?
"Ol Shy & Bashfu  2008-08-31 19:53:20 
Re: Too Old?
Dudley Henriques <dhen  2008-08-31 23:21:49 
Re: Too Old?
"RST Engineering&quo  2008-09-01 08:53:30 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-01 13:09:52 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-01 22:25:25 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-01 20:55:04 
Re: Too Old?
w <loverlyvagina@[EMAI  2008-09-01 17:28:09 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-02 02:01:10 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-01 20:10:54 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-02 01:45:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-02 06:46:56 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-02 05:05:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-03 06:02:42 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-03 04:45:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 05:59:53 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 04:35:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-04 19:43:28 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 18:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:03:30 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:18:53 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:06:02 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-05 06:20:25 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:18:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-05 06:21:51 
Re: Too Old?
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-09-05 06:10:11 
Re: Too Old?
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-09-04 09:40:02 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 15:15:04 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-04 16:56:15 
Re: Too Old?
yaeedyaeegiisss <daige  2008-09-04 11:16:31 
Re: Too Old?
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-09-05 13:41:40 
Re: Too Old?
a <pappson@[EMAIL PROT  2008-09-05 16:50:10 
Re: Too Old?
george <gblack@[EMAIL   2008-09-05 13:22:53 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-01 20:59:35 
Re: Too Old?
BobR <reed1@[EMAIL PRO  2008-09-04 14:58:50 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-04 22:35:05 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 17:51:55 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:07:59 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:14:17 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 05:57:44 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:35:06 
Re: Too Old?
Gig 601Xl Builder <wrg  2008-09-05 08:08:10 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 00:25:08 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 01:15:07 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 01:19:50 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 21:02:55 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:01:10 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 16:02:22 
Re: Too Old?
"Tim" <skyhi  2008-09-05 10:17:25 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 21:15:07 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 19:35:04 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 19:36:51 
Re: Too Old?
"Peter Dohm" &l  2008-09-05 18:59:26 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-05 18:18:07 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 16:45:04 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 21:15:32 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 19:35:05 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 19:37:24 
Re: Too Old?
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-09-04 21:40:38 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:11:09 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:05:31 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 06:04:45 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-05 06:19:00 
Re: Too Old?
Bertie the Bunyip <AA@  2008-09-05 11:25:20 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:06:59 
Re: Too Old?
"Lonnie" <@[  2008-09-04 22:16:07 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:35:07 
Re: Too Old?
"Viperdoc" <  2008-09-05 18:19:06 
Re: Too Old?
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@[EM  2008-09-05 05:05:10 
Re: Too Old?
jimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-09-05 03:25:05 
Re: Too Old?
Ricky <jesusisbetter@[  2008-09-01 17:52:52 
Re: Too Old?
"Ol Shy & Bashfu  2008-09-01 19:32:20 
Re: Too Old?
george <gblack@[EMAIL   2008-09-02 13:39:35 
Re: Too Old?
"Steve Foley" &  2008-09-02 13:35:10 
Re: Too Old?
"Chris J" <c  2008-09-03 00:23:04 
Re: Too Old?
"Peter Dohm" &l  2008-09-03 06:53:25 
Re: Too Old?
Gezellig <nokonihi@[EM  2008-09-03 13:15:52 
Re: Too Old?
Mike Spera <mwspera@[E  2008-10-04 08:27:13 
Re: Too Old?
"Wayne Paul" &l  2008-10-04 10:04:19 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 18:32:18 CST 2008.