by "Lonnie" <@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sep 4, 2008 at 10:14 PM
"Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:ti81c415g7dv6v90na56bb7kc9jrv1bpov@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Lonnie" <@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
>> 5) FAA minimums on Ox usage are conservative enough to acomodate even
>> heavy
>> smokers.
>
> Perhaps they are conservative enough to keep smokers from dying, but not
> conservative enough to ****eld smokers from the effects of altitude.
Heavy
> smokers can hardly increase in altitude at all without suffering the
> effects
> of altitude, beginning with vision impairment, usually.
No ****, when was the last time you flew a cabin load of heavy smokers to
altitude?
