by Bertie the Bunyip <AA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sep 5, 2008 at 05:57 AM
"Lonnie" <@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:ku1wk.9204$676.6992@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:ti81c415g7dv6v90na56bb7kc9jrv1bpov@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Lonnie" <@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>
>>> 5) FAA minimums on Ox usage are conservative enough to acomodate
>>> even heavy
>>> smokers.
>>
>> Perhaps they are conservative enough to keep smokers from dying, but
>> not conservative enough to ****eld smokers from the effects of
>> altitude. Heavy smokers can hardly increase in altitude at all
>> without suffering the effects
>> of altitude, beginning with vision impairment, usually.
>
> No ****, when was the last time you flew a cabin load of heavy smokers
> to altitude?
When's the last time you flew, Maxwell?
Bertie
