Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > IFR – Instrument Flight Rules > Re: Failed Avia...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 12 Topic 1859 of 2034
Post > Topic >>

Re: Failed Aviation Administration News

by HuhWhat? <br549@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 19, 2008 at 11:38 PM

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
> "HuhWhat?" <br549@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:VsgEj.28$j66.14@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Whatever. You have no idea what my aviation background is.
>> If I told you it would not be believed anyway so what's the point?
>>
> 
> Based on your messages here one must conclude that your aviation
background 
> does not extend beyond a brief period of FAA employ.
> 
> 
>> I will tell you this. I know a lot about aviation.
>>
> 
> No, you only think you know a lot about aviation. 
> 
> 
Yea you are right. I don't know ****


The aim of this research was to investigate Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA) activity before and after 6 
catastrophic airline accidents to examine the alleged 
reactive policy-setting reputation of the FAA. Actions 
reviewed were regulatory, inspection, and enforcement 
activities. The study revealed that change in agency 
activity does occur following an accident. The location of 
the event appears to influence the direction of change. When 
accidents occurred within the U.S., FAA activity increased 
following the incident; the opposite occurred for airline 
accidents outside the U.S. The increase in FAA activity 
following U.S.-based events sup****ts the reactive, 
"tombstone agency" reputation the FAA has acquired. The 
result of this research was an increased understanding of 
how the FAA responds to airline accidents and the 
consequences of the response.

http://ntlsearch.bts.gov/tris/record/tris/00819511.html
 




 12 Posts in Topic:
Failed Aviation Administration News
HuhWhat? <br549@[EMAIL  2008-03-18 17:23:02 
Re: Failed Aviation Administration News
"Steven P. McNicoll&  2008-03-18 22:18:09 
Re: Failed Aviation Administration News
Jay Maynard <jmaynard@  2008-03-19 04:05:24 
Re: Failed Aviation Administration News
HuhWhat? <br549@[EMAIL  2008-03-19 15:09:35 
Re: Failed Aviation Administration News
"Steven P. McNicoll&  2008-03-19 15:26:17 
Re: Failed Aviation Administration News
HuhWhat? <br549@[EMAIL  2008-03-19 18:29:09 
Re: Failed Aviation Administration News
"Steven P. McNicoll&  2008-03-19 17:38:34 
Re: Failed Aviation Administration News
HuhWhat? <br549@[EMAIL  2008-03-19 23:38:59 
Re: Failed Aviation Administration News
"Steven P. McNicoll&  2008-03-20 04:24:17 
Re: Failed Aviation Administration News
"Dan Luke" <  2008-03-19 21:14:09 
Re: Failed Aviation Administration News
Jon <jon@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-03-21 08:32:19 
Re: Failed Aviation Administration News
"Capt. Geoffrey Thor  2008-03-21 16:12:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 18:15:45 CST 2008.