Question:
I read the latest LTA (letter to airman, 2008/06/19) for the latest
RNAV flight plan. In the last paragraph, it says
"It is im****tant to communicate your maximum RNAV capability so the
filer can enter information which allows FAA automation to generate
RNAV arrival and departure routes for qualified aircraft."
It seems that a WAAS GPS (such as GNS430W/530W) has qualified RNP for
RANV1 or RNAV2. Therefore, if we have a WAAS GPS, shall we use the
equipment suffix of /R instead of /G ?
If we use /G, will ATC not grant (or affect) the RNAV/LPV approaches
for a WAAS aircraft under the new flight plan?
How about will it affect filing or flying a RNAV STAR/DP ?
(Please read FAA Advisory Circular Information AC 90-100A and AC
90-45A before answer the question.)
In the previous post in 2005, someone said we shall use /G (see
below), is this still true?
Thanks in advance.
jbskies
On Sep 3 2005, 6:32 am, T...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> /G
>
>
>
> Ron Rosenfeld wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 18:56:15 -0700, T...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > >It was a both a typo and a misunderstanding about 146 boxes when I
made the
> > >original post. One of my sources pointed out after my initial
posting that 146
> > >boxes were good to go absentWAASNOTAMs.
>
> > >My purpose of having made the posting was to point out to users of
this Usenet
> > >group the onnerous requirements just imposed on most IFR GPS users.
>
> > Now that that's cleared up, do you know whichequipmentsuffixshould be
> > used for those with GPS units that are capable of the RNP2 and RNP1
> > requirements (in order to fly the RNAV SIDS/STARS)? Should we be
using /G
> > or /R (assuming no RVSM)?
>
> > Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)- Hide quoted text
-
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
