AIUI, AC 90-100A != "RNP" as applied to oceanic airspace etc. Without
a FSDO letter you're still GLOVZ/C(S) presuming normal non-ADF
equipped with mode C(S) transponder. See AC 90-96A where I think they
differentiate specifically between ICAO RNP and the stuff they're
doing domestically.
FWIW, I've been assigned an RNAV DP from an MCO area air****t having
filed a domestic ICAO plan with the above equipment codes and the
appropriate NAV/RNVD1E2A1 comment. Whether that was a fluke or not I
guess remains to be seen.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT), jbskies <jbskies@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>Question:
>
>I read the latest LTA (letter to airman, 2008/06/19) for the latest
>RNAV flight plan. In the last paragraph, it says
>
>"It is im****tant to communicate your maximum RNAV capability so the
>filer can enter information which allows FAA automation to generate
>RNAV arrival and departure routes for qualified aircraft."
>
>It seems that a WAAS GPS (such as GNS430W/530W) has qualified RNP for
>RANV1 or RNAV2. Therefore, if we have a WAAS GPS, shall we use the
>equipment suffix of /R instead of /G ?
>
>If we use /G, will ATC not grant (or affect) the RNAV/LPV approaches
>for a WAAS aircraft under the new flight plan?
>
>How about will it affect filing or flying a RNAV STAR/DP ?
>
>
>(Please read FAA Advisory Circular Information AC 90-100A and AC
>90-45A before answer the question.)
>
>
>In the previous post in 2005, someone said we shall use /G (see
>below), is this still true?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>jbskies
>
>
>On Sep 3 2005, 6:32 am, T...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> /G
>>
>>
>>
>> Ron Rosenfeld wrote:
>> > On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 18:56:15 -0700, T...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>> > >It was a both a typo and a misunderstanding about 146 boxes when I
made the
>> > >original post. One of my sources pointed out after my initial
posting that 146
>> > >boxes were good to go absentWAASNOTAMs.
>>
>> > >My purpose of having made the posting was to point out to users of
this Usenet
>> > >group the onnerous requirements just imposed on most IFR GPS users.
>>
>> > Now that that's cleared up, do you know whichequipmentsuffixshould be
>> > used for those with GPS units that are capable of the RNP2 and RNP1
>> > requirements (in order to fly the RNAV SIDS/STARS)? Should we be
using /G
>> > or /R (assuming no RVSM)?
>>
>> > Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)- Hide quoted
text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
|
