Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Miscellaneous topics > Re: Is Moller a...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 9 of 11 Topic 1772 of 1913
Post > Topic >>

Re: Is Moller at it again?

by "Stuart & Kathryn Fields" <sfkf@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 1, 2007 at 09:20 AM

John:   I've  included the statement used below by AirScooter in
publisizing 
their products.  This kind of stuff is common with Moller also.  While I 
like and have used his Super Trapp exhaust, there has yet to be a flying 
machine produced by him that even approaches the outlandish advertisements

and claims.
It is my personal opinion that businesses practicing this kind of stuff
are 
to be avoided.
 Safe Harbor Statement: This press release contains forward-looking 
statements within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the
Private 
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should not place undue 
reliance on these forward-looking statements. These statements involve
risks 
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from 
those suggested in the forward-looking statements, particularly those
risks 
and uncertainties inherent in the process of developing, manufacturing and

distributing aeronautical products and engines. Factors that may cause
such 
a difference include risks related to AirScooter's limited operating 
history, risks associated with completing development and successful 
production of AirScooter products, the risk that AirScooter products will 
not meet with market acceptance, the risk of future warranty and product 
liability claims, the uncertainty of AirScooter's future access to capital

to sustain operations, achieve profitability or continue as a going
concern, 
the failure by AirScooter to secure and maintain relation****ps with 
suppliers, manufacturers and other third parties, reliance on key
employees, 
and dependence on intellectual property. Further information on the
factors 
and risks that could affect AirScooter's business, financial condition and

results of operations, are contained in AirScooter's public cor****ate 
do***ents. These forward-looking statements are based on information and 
management's expectations as of the date hereof. Future results may differ

materially from our current expectations. AirScooter Cor****ation disclaims

any intent or obligation to update those forward-looking statements,
except 
as otherwise specifically stated.



-- 
Stuart & Kathryn Fields, Publishers
Experimental Helo magazine
P. O. Box 1585
Inyokern, CA 93527
(760) 377-4478 ph
(760) 408-9747 publication cell
(760) 608-1299 technical cell
www.experimentalhelo.com
www.vkss.com
eh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"John A. Weeks III" <john@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:john-014F79.09532901092007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <642v8eah.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Bob Fry <bobfry@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> >>>>> "JW" == John A Weeks, <John> writes:
>>
>>     JW> How do you mean "at it again"?  Moller has been in business
>>     JW> for many years.  They have had several highly successful
>>     JW> products, and they continue to develop their prototypes for
>>     JW> flying vehicles.
>>
>> If a business can consist of promoting a completely impractical
>> machine, and products being successfully scammed grants and
>> investments, then I agree with you.
>
> So, do you consider the Wright Brothers and Bell Helicopters
> to be scams, also?  One used a bicycle shop to fund a 20 year
> long quest for powered flight, while the other spent 15 years
> and 1.5-billion developing the tilt-rotor aircraft.  How is
> that any different from Moller manufacturing products like
> mufflers and motors, and doing contract R&D, to fund his
> dream of the flying car?  In your world, would you have
> put someone like Dean Kaman in prison for using profits from
> his dialysis machine to fund the design of the Segway human
> trans****ter?  I guess you would have been leading the effort
> to have Galileo blinded for looking into the heavens with
> his telescope.
>
> -john-
>
> -- 
> ======================================================================
> John A. Weeks III           952-432-2708            john@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Newave Communications                         http://www.johnweeks.com
> ======================================================================
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
Is Moller at it again?
Chris Wells <Chris.Wel  2007-08-31 18:38:22 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"Al G" <age  2007-08-31 12:42:21 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"John A. Weeks III&q  2007-08-31 16:10:42 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
ptomblin+netnews@[EMAIL P  2007-08-31 21:52:59 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"John A. Weeks III&q  2007-09-01 09:47:14 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"Al G" <age  2007-09-07 09:49:47 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
Bob Fry <bobfry@[EMAIL  2007-08-31 16:39:18 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"John A. Weeks III&q  2007-09-01 09:53:29 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"Stuart & Kathry  2007-09-01 09:20:50 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
Orval Fairbairn <orfai  2007-09-01 14:50:03 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"Stuart & Kathry  2007-09-02 11:33:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 20:24:21 CST 2008.