Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Miscellaneous topics > Re: Is Moller a...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 10 of 11 Topic 1772 of 1913
Post > Topic >>

Re: Is Moller at it again?

by Orval Fairbairn <orfairbairn@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 1, 2007 at 02:50 PM

In article 
<john-014F79.09532901092007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 "John A. Weeks III" <john@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> In article <642v8eah.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  Bob Fry <bobfry@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> > >>>>> "JW" == John A Weeks, <John> writes:
> > 
> >     JW> How do you mean "at it again"?  Moller has been in business
> >     JW> for many years.  They have had several highly successful
> >     JW> products, and they continue to develop their prototypes for
> >     JW> flying vehicles.
> > 
> > If a business can consist of promoting a completely impractical
> > machine, and products being successfully scammed grants and
> > investments, then I agree with you.
> 
> So, do you consider the Wright Brothers and Bell Helicopters
> to be scams, also?  One used a bicycle shop to fund a 20 year
> long quest for powered flight, while the other spent 15 years
> and 1.5-billion developing the tilt-rotor aircraft.  How is
> that any different from Moller manufacturing products like
> mufflers and motors, and doing contract R&D, to fund his
> dream of the flying car?  In your world, would you have
> put someone like Dean Kaman in prison for using profits from
> his dialysis machine to fund the design of the Segway human
> trans****ter?  I guess you would have been leading the effort
> to have Galileo blinded for looking into the heavens with
> his telescope.
> 
> -john-

There is a HUGE difference between the Wrights, Sikorsky and BEll from 
Moller.

The former used a methodical engineering and scientific approach to 
developing their machines BEFORE they announced them, whereas Moller, 
for at least 30 years, has announced his machines before they flew 
successfully.

He does not hold an aeronautical engineering degree, is not a pilot and 
apparently has no clue as to how aircraft fly or operate. His machine is 
a Rube Goldberg contraption with 8 engines, all of which must be 
operating in perfect tune and "electronically synchronized". 

He has never had even one successful test flight without a tether or a 
crane keeping the thing in the air. 

How many ways can you spell "scam" or pronounce "s**** oil"?
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
Is Moller at it again?
Chris Wells <Chris.Wel  2007-08-31 18:38:22 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"Al G" <age  2007-08-31 12:42:21 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"John A. Weeks III&q  2007-08-31 16:10:42 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
ptomblin+netnews@[EMAIL P  2007-08-31 21:52:59 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"John A. Weeks III&q  2007-09-01 09:47:14 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"Al G" <age  2007-09-07 09:49:47 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
Bob Fry <bobfry@[EMAIL  2007-08-31 16:39:18 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"John A. Weeks III&q  2007-09-01 09:53:29 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"Stuart & Kathry  2007-09-01 09:20:50 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
Orval Fairbairn <orfai  2007-09-01 14:50:03 
Re: Is Moller at it again?
"Stuart & Kathry  2007-09-02 11:33:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 20:12:20 CST 2008.