Re: FA: Cessna 150

In rec.aviation.misc Brian Whatcott <betwys1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:33:31 GMT, "Vaughn Simon"
> <vaughnsimonHATESSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>>
>>"Brian Whatcott" <betwys1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 

>>> They go about $16K-$17K like this.....
>>
>>    Like what?  Except for engine/airframe hours, the description gives 
>>virtually nothing of the usual information you expect in an advertisment
to sell 
>>a airplane.   ...yet people seem to be bidding...

Winning bid was $21.1k; at what hours will this 150 need a major overhaul?
(Seller claimed Total Time of 1757 hrs on plane and engine).


> I guess it's not red-hot news: when you run a multiple regression on
> factors bearing on selling price of a 150, time since major counts,
> airframe age counts less along with age.   In fact, it's easy to model
> using age AND TT where TT is a PLUS factor!
> It's the nearest thing to a commodity airplane there is


-- 
The published From: address is a trap.
Ron Paul 2008!