In article <d4mlgkta.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Bob Fry <bobfry@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>> "OF" == Orval Fairbairn <o_r_fairbairn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> OF> I just saw an ad for ASL CamGuard and wonder if anyone out
> OF> there has any experiences with this product that they would
> OF> like to share.
>
> Aviation Consumer tested it favorably:
>
> "The middle ground--and it's admittedly vast--is the 60 hour-a-year
> owner who needs the airplane for three hours each December through
> March. CamGuard is the clear winner here, since its performance is
> nearly as good as the dedicated storage oils, it's cheaper and allows
> normal operation.
>
> Thus far, we've been impressed with CamGuard and we're using it in our
> own airplane. As we go to press this month, CamGuard is on the verge
> of obtaining FAA approval. Frankly, that doesn't impress us much but
> some buyers want the FAA imprimatur. Approved or not, we think it's a
> good product."
>
>
http://www.aviationconsumer.com/issues/36_4/maintenancematters/5541-1.html
>
> OF> Is it just a detergent
>
> No. Detergents aren't used in aviation engines.
>
> OF> does it have lubricating properties, such as TCP has?
>
> No. TCP isn't a lubricant. CamGuard is an anti-corrosion additive, not
> a lubricant.
I want to thank everybody who responded. I may just try the stuff!
Orval
--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.
|
