Larry Dighera <LDighera@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:u1sc64dj2vegu6t8psut97hgcdcjk4ontj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:46:46 -0400, "Morgans"
> <jsmorgan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in <Pui9k.1464$Hi7.476@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>
>>There is only one solution, at this point in the evolution of the
>>rec.aviation groups, especially this one.
>
> The BEST solution is for you and the other lurkers in this newsgroup
> to begin posting on-topic aviation articles. Here are some topics you
> might consider:
>
> 1. PIREPS 2. Federal Aviation Politics
> 3. Aviation Safety 4. State Aviation Politics
> 5. Aviation Industry News 6. Local Aviation Politics
> 7. Hangar Flying 8. Aerial Navigation
> 9. Aviation Metrology 10. Aviation History
> 11. Military Aviation 12. Flight Training
> 13. FAA News & Information 14. NTSB News
> 15. DoT Aviation News 16. DoD Aviation News
> 17. ... (other topic suggestions solicited)
>
> This forum is ideal for immediate worldwide dissemination of aviation
> news, so if you know or read or hear of some aviation related news,
> post an article here.
>
> Failing to publish aviation content here and then complaining about
> the less than optimal signal-to-noise ratio in this news group only
> serves to make you look silly, empower the trolls, and further reduce
> the signal-to-noise ratio.
Does that include little notifications of crossposting?
Bertie
>
|
