Re: 2 recent incidents

Darryl Ramm <darryl.ramm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 4:17 pm, Ramy <ryan...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Two recent incidents which all sounds too familiar and we can all
>> learn from them:
>>
>> 1 - Another spoilers out/rudder waggle resulting in premature release
>> - How many more of those we need till we conclude that the rudder
>> waggle does NOT work? What happened to radio
>> communication?http://www.nts

> b.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?ev_id=20080603X00777&key=1
>>
>> 2 - Another restricted control due to unsecured item. I bet this
>> caused more accidents then we know
>> of.http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?

> ev_id=20080606X00809&key=1
>>
>> Ramy
> 
> Yep, why we can't also have radio communications as well is beyond me.
> Radio by itself has to be safer on average at low altitude.

There seems to be a certain (accidental?) irony in re****ting the two 
accidents: in one case radio comm would presumably have made the signal 
from the tow pilot clear, while in the other it was a loose radio that may

have blocked forward movement of the stick.

My instructor has placed a hand held radio in a waist bag secured to her. 
But it isn't of much use during these early flights since she needs to
have 
her hands free to be ready to save us from screwups by the student. ;-)