Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Sailplanes, hanggliders > Re: 2 recent in...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 12 of 43 Topic 7696 of 8357
Post > Topic >>

Re: 2 recent incidents

by RRK <richardkaleta@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 25, 2008 at 09:06 PM

On Jun 25, 11:33 pm, Darryl Ramm <darryl.r...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 8:02 pm, "Bill Daniels" <bildan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Gary Emerson" <emerson_g...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >news:UWB8k.4816$LG4.2438@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > How many more of those we need till we conclude that the rudder
> > >> waggle does NOT work?
>
> > > I think this is a reasonably valid point.  There HAVE been a number
o=
f
> > > people who have misunderstood this signal.
>
> > > Perhaps something else would be better.  The question is what signal
=
would
> > > be a good replacement.  You could have fla****ng lights on the
towplan=
e,
> > > perhaps mounted just above the towhitch.  The only thing is you'd
pro=
bably
> > > have to install two lights.  Say one yellow and one red.
>
> > > Yellow means you've got a problem, but if you can get it fixed
pretty
> > > quick we'll keep going.  Red means get off now or I'm gonna dump
you.
>
> > > If you don't have two signals, I'd bet that we'd still have people
> > > releasing when they didn't have to.
>
> > > As I think about it, it might be best if there was a single array of
=
high
> > > output LEDs.  When both "colors" of the array are "on" then you have
=
a
> > > single visible color that means "ok" (red and blue make green in
conc=
ept,
> > > but in emitted light that combination doesn't work).  That way the
gl=
ider
> > > pilot can verify at the start that both signals "work" and they stay
=
"on"
> > > for the duration of the tow.  If either the "warning" or "get off"
> > > switches are selected in the cockpit then only the corresponding
"col=
or"
> > > is then visible to the glider pilot.  Perhaps with the "warning"
bein=
g a
> > > steady signal and "get off" being a rapid flash to help with fast
> > > recognition and a sense of urgency.
>
> > > Other thoughts?
>
> > The tuggie should condiser if a signal is needed.  If they are
climbing=
 in
> > spite of open spoilers the best option is to wait until the glider
coul=
d
> > release and land safely before wagging the rudder.  A premature rudder
=
wag
> > may have caused some of these incidents.
>
> > I wouldn't neccessarilly say radio is the simplest option.  If a pilot
=
can't
> > remember to close the spoilers, or notice that they are open, could he
> > operate a radio and fly a glider at the same time?
>
> > High brightness LED's are a really simple idea.  Some tuggies could
use=
 them
> > as turn signals.
>
> > Bill D
>
> Exactly, but this was a two place ****p and may have been at high
> density altitudes. . The glider pilot does not need to operate the
> radio, he just has to listen. Yes he needs to be tuned to the right
> frequency and have the volume up, etc. That's what preflight
> checklists and radio checks are for, and yes people will still get
> this wrong. But if the glider radio is not working then the rudder
> waggle can be used and ultimately if necessary  a rock off or rope
> guillotine/release (again preferably at altitude).
>
> BTW that BFR (or spring checkout) I mentioned should involve pulling
> the spoilers open on tow at altitude, and maybe different tow speeds,
> and just leaving them flapping around as well to see what they do.
> This will show what it feels like and you get to experience the radio
> call/signals from the tow plane that result.
>
> I've only had spoilers pop open on a DG-1000S on tow, hit a sharp bump
> at a few hundred feet and they popped (not properly closed no doubt by
> yours truly) the Piggott hook did its job and the noise of the
> spoilers vibrating up and down  gets your attention. For Piggott hook
> equipped gliders I think it is worth demonstrating this as well during
> a BFR/spring checkout.
>
> Darryl



"Waggling the rudder=94 signal, like any other =93secondary=94 signal is
perfectly OK.
 THE PROBLEM most of those "absent minded" glider pilots have, is NOT
KNOWING a most im****tant signal:  The =93Wave Off" signal. In my old
country, I was taught to release from tow plane only when I was rock
off. And only then. Period. As a result, I had a chance to see that
signal every time I took a tow. Hundreds times. I know that signal
very well. And to be safe you have to know this signal very well.
Practice, my young friends. What is wrong wit a mandatory waving off
the gliders at the end of the tow? Every day for practice=85and once in
a lifetime for safety.
rrk
 




 43 Posts in Topic:
2 recent incidents
Ramy <ryanetz@[EMAIL P  2008-06-25 16:17:18 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Darryl Ramm <darryl.ra  2008-06-25 17:04:42 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-06-25 19:27:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Gary Emerson <emerson_  2008-06-25 20:07:02 
Re: 2 recent incidents
"Bill Daniels"   2008-06-25 21:02:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-06-25 23:07:36 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-06-26 09:51:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-26 06:00:35 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Jack <jack_hallett@[EM  2008-07-17 00:35:08 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Darryl Ramm <darryl.ra  2008-06-25 18:21:24 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Darryl Ramm <darryl.ra  2008-06-25 20:33:15 
Re: 2 recent incidents
RRK <richardkaleta@[EM  2008-06-25 21:06:53 
Re: 2 recent incidents
John Smith <john@[EMAI  2008-06-26 14:20:32 
Re: 2 recent incidents
R <Nospam@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-26 16:25:04 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Jim Beckman <jamesbeck  2008-06-27 13:12:54 
Re: 2 recent incidents
unclhank@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-26 07:32:41 
Re: 2 recent incidents
John Smith <john@[EMAI  2008-06-26 19:19:55 
Re: 2 recent incidents
jb92563 <jb92563@[EMAI  2008-06-26 08:25:43 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Marc Ramsey <marc@[EMA  2008-06-26 09:12:52 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Bob Whelan <rfwhelan@[  2008-06-26 11:20:02 
Re: 2 recent incidents
"Bill Daniels"   2008-06-26 12:34:55 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Darryl Ramm <darryl.ra  2008-06-26 09:10:30 
Re: 2 recent incidents
"kirk.stant" &l  2008-06-26 10:24:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Ramy <ryanetz@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 10:44:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
ZZ <zzuluzulu@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 17:47:04 
Re: 2 recent incidents
"BT" <bNOtiz  2008-06-26 18:49:03 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Ramy <ryanetz@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 21:52:35 
Re: 2 recent incidents
ZZ <zzuluzulu@[EMAIL P  2008-06-27 08:14:50 
Re: 2 recent incidents
"Bill Daniels"   2008-06-27 14:49:47 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Tinpilot <ed@[EMAIL  2008-06-27 21:57:54 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Tinpilot <ed@[EMAIL  2008-06-27 22:57:53 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Nigel Pocock <nigelpoc  2008-06-27 16:57:55 
Re: 2 recent incidents
jb92563 <jb92563@[EMAI  2008-06-27 08:31:08 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Jim Beckman <jamesbeck  2008-06-28 12:27:51 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Ed Downham <remove_to_  2008-06-29 09:57:49 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Ramy <ryanetz@[EMAIL P  2008-06-27 14:18:50 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Eric Greenwell <flyguy  2008-07-04 18:12:22 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Ian <ian.no@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-28 00:06:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Lavajava@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-29 18:46:59 
Re: 2 recent incidents
jb92563 <jb92563@[EMAI  2008-07-17 08:11:11 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Don Johnstone <gpnet2@  2008-07-17 21:41:42 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Martin Gregorie <marti  2008-07-18 15:05:59 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Cats <ramwater@[EMAIL   2008-07-18 07:16:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 20:56:46 CST 2008.