Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Sailplanes, hanggliders > Re: 2 recent in...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 20 of 43 Topic 7696 of 8357
Post > Topic >>

Re: 2 recent incidents

by Bob Whelan <rfwhelan@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 26, 2008 at 11:20 AM

jb92563 wrote:
>> As I think about it, it might be best if there was a single array of
>> high output LEDs.  <Details snipped...>
>>
>> Other thoughts?
> 
> People will misunderstand lights just as easily as a rudder waggle.
> 
> Its a training issue and they just need to know what the signal means
> by practice.
> 
> <Details snipped...>
> 
> Lights fail, radios fail, tow plane electircal systems fail and a Wag
> or a Rock will still communicate with a glider on tow.
> 
> The signal system works just fine, its just that the receivers of the
> signal are learning something new to them and sometimes
> mistakes are made.
> 
> We should start a thread on Pilot Mistakes, and you can be sure there
> will be 1000 hr pilots making entires there as well.
> 
> Ray

Panacea fixes...what a panacea it would be if a few of them actually 
worked.  (WARNING: Dry humor nearby.)

Some pertinent realities...
- Perfection is never an option.
- Panacea fixes aren't.
- Thought processes matter.
- Training is good, too.

Here's a thought process that has worked for me...so far.  Being fairly 
simple-minded, I struggle with remembering rules for rules' sake.  I 
compensate by a reasonably decent ability to remember WHY certain 
rules/guidelines/suggestions exist...and I seek to prioritize things I 
DO remember.  (I care little about remembering trivia; I care a LOT 
about remembering 'im****tant stuff.')

Here's a couple of soaring examples:
1) Visual tow signals (work all the time, unless being towed in 
[*really*] hard IFR) - In life and death terms, a strong argument can be 
made that only one need be remembered, the wing-rock signal.  None of 
the others are indicative of (immediately) life-threatening (to you or 
the tuggie) situations.

Can't remember what a rudder waggle (or any other 
arcane/new/untrained-for/yet-to-be-devised) signal is for?  No problem! 
  It's NOT the dreaded wing-rock...so no precipitate action is 
necessary.      Heck, you could even turn on the radio and ask, if your 
Embarrassment Quotient hasn't been exceeded on that particular tow.

2) Landing pattern mistakes - THE one boo-boo practically guaranteed to 
kill you in a landing pattern is the inadvertent stall/spin.  I deal 
with that not by trying to remember all of the books'-worth of advice 
out there (mostly useful and sensible and germane), but by a 
combinatorial thought approach: a) Kid(s) - don't DO that (i.e. the 
inadvertent uncoordinated pattern stall)!!! b) Pay attention to Rule a).

Everything else rule-based falls out in the wash...requisite pattern 
speed, requisite pattern coordination, requisite pattern pattern, etc...

3) Soaring-in-general - Soaring is real safe as long as you don't hit 
anything (hidden assumption...that you don't want to hit).

For what it's worth, I can't recall learning any of the above from any 
of my (generally excellent) instructors (and the comment is not intended 
to be in any way derogatory or condescending).  Nevertheless, I'm happy 
with the (36-year) results-to-date.  I did yank off on my (sole) 
wing-rock received.  I haven't inadvertently stalled in the pattern.  I 
haven't inadvertently hit anything I wasn't already intentionally aiming
at.

Nor have I (yet) seen a rudder waggle...but if I DO see one, I'm pretty 
certain I'm not going to yank off for mis-interpretational reasons...

Respectfully,
Bob - VRAM-limited - W.
 




 43 Posts in Topic:
2 recent incidents
Ramy <ryanetz@[EMAIL P  2008-06-25 16:17:18 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Darryl Ramm <darryl.ra  2008-06-25 17:04:42 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-06-25 19:27:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Gary Emerson <emerson_  2008-06-25 20:07:02 
Re: 2 recent incidents
"Bill Daniels"   2008-06-25 21:02:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-06-25 23:07:36 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-06-26 09:51:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-26 06:00:35 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Jack <jack_hallett@[EM  2008-07-17 00:35:08 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Darryl Ramm <darryl.ra  2008-06-25 18:21:24 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Darryl Ramm <darryl.ra  2008-06-25 20:33:15 
Re: 2 recent incidents
RRK <richardkaleta@[EM  2008-06-25 21:06:53 
Re: 2 recent incidents
John Smith <john@[EMAI  2008-06-26 14:20:32 
Re: 2 recent incidents
R <Nospam@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-26 16:25:04 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Jim Beckman <jamesbeck  2008-06-27 13:12:54 
Re: 2 recent incidents
unclhank@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-26 07:32:41 
Re: 2 recent incidents
John Smith <john@[EMAI  2008-06-26 19:19:55 
Re: 2 recent incidents
jb92563 <jb92563@[EMAI  2008-06-26 08:25:43 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Marc Ramsey <marc@[EMA  2008-06-26 09:12:52 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Bob Whelan <rfwhelan@[  2008-06-26 11:20:02 
Re: 2 recent incidents
"Bill Daniels"   2008-06-26 12:34:55 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Darryl Ramm <darryl.ra  2008-06-26 09:10:30 
Re: 2 recent incidents
"kirk.stant" &l  2008-06-26 10:24:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Ramy <ryanetz@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 10:44:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
ZZ <zzuluzulu@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 17:47:04 
Re: 2 recent incidents
"BT" <bNOtiz  2008-06-26 18:49:03 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Ramy <ryanetz@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 21:52:35 
Re: 2 recent incidents
ZZ <zzuluzulu@[EMAIL P  2008-06-27 08:14:50 
Re: 2 recent incidents
"Bill Daniels"   2008-06-27 14:49:47 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Tinpilot <ed@[EMAIL  2008-06-27 21:57:54 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Tinpilot <ed@[EMAIL  2008-06-27 22:57:53 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Nigel Pocock <nigelpoc  2008-06-27 16:57:55 
Re: 2 recent incidents
jb92563 <jb92563@[EMAI  2008-06-27 08:31:08 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Jim Beckman <jamesbeck  2008-06-28 12:27:51 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Ed Downham <remove_to_  2008-06-29 09:57:49 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Ramy <ryanetz@[EMAIL P  2008-06-27 14:18:50 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Eric Greenwell <flyguy  2008-07-04 18:12:22 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Ian <ian.no@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-28 00:06:28 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Lavajava@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-29 18:46:59 
Re: 2 recent incidents
jb92563 <jb92563@[EMAI  2008-07-17 08:11:11 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Don Johnstone <gpnet2@  2008-07-17 21:41:42 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Martin Gregorie <marti  2008-07-18 15:05:59 
Re: 2 recent incidents
Cats <ramwater@[EMAIL   2008-07-18 07:16:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 19:15:40 CST 2008.