Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Sailplanes, hanggliders > Re: Tom Knauff'...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 52 Topic 7724 of 8357
Post > Topic >>

Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter

by Gary Emerson <emerson_gary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 1, 2008 at 06:43 AM

> 
> Examples of the questions include:
> 
> During a left turn on aero tow, which side of the towplane should the
> glider pilot see?
> 
> A.	Left side
> B.	Right Side
> C.	Both sides equally
> D.	Which side does not matter as long as the glider is not too high.
> 
> During a steep, continuous left hand turn, how are the controls held?
> 
> A.	Left Aileron, right rudder, back stick
> B.	Left aileron, left rudder, back stick
> C.	Right aileron, right rudder, back stick
> D.	Right aileron, left rudder, back stick
> 

First, I think Tom is mostly right, but I'll make a couple of points.

Look at the two questions above.  I'd suggest that these questions are 
both moot.  On the first question I would have originally said A, but 
this past weekend while on tow I realized that the angle is pretty small 
and you can actually see both sides almost the same as long as the turn 
isn't very sharp.  But WHO CARES????  Just because I couldn't remember 
this visual image with photographic memory doesn't make me a bad pilot 
or an unaware pilot.  I can certainly recognize when I'm out of position 
laterally without having to ask myself if I'm looking at one side of the 
towplane more than the other.

Same goes for the second question.  I CAN make very steep coordinated 
turns.  I don't have to verbalize to myself what I need to do with the 
controls in order to do it.  It just happens.  Again, not being able to 
verbalize this doesn't make one a bad pilot.

Now, back to the original point.  There ARE some number of people who 
have mis-understood the rudder wag signal.  Tom's solution is to blame 
those people and he's mostly right.  I'm not saying that there aren't 
plenty of people flying today who couldn't pass the FAA written right 
now, but IF (big IF) a different signal could be developed that was LESS 
prone to confusion with the rock off signal we might keep a couple of 
people from at least cra****ng, if not dying.  IF the towpilot is giving 
the rudder wag signal to someone, that gliderpilot is probably already 
in a stressful situation because the tow isn't going well.  True, they 
should be more prepared, but if a different signal could be developed 
that helped, wouldn't we all be better off?
 




 52 Posts in Topic:
Tom Knauff's newsletter
pik20pilot@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-29 20:32:27 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Randy <rgteel@[EMAIL P  2008-06-30 00:42:30 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Ian <ian.groups@[EMAIL  2008-06-30 02:40:13 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
tknauff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-30 04:34:01 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Chris Reed <chris.reed  2008-06-30 15:13:43 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Jim Beckman <jamesbeck  2008-06-30 19:57:43 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-06-30 12:49:54 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-06-30 12:38:10 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-06-30 20:27:43 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Bob Whelan <rfwhelan@[  2008-06-30 16:31:42 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-06-30 23:57:44 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Brad <apispilot@[EMAIL  2008-06-30 17:39:50 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-06-30 19:04:20 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"bumper" <bu  2008-07-01 15:24:16 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-01 07:12:39 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Gary Emerson <emerson_  2008-07-01 06:43:46 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Soarin Again <shadowli  2008-07-01 13:57:40 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-07-01 08:08:03 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Mike Schumann"  2008-07-01 21:33:41 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
George Knight <george_  2008-07-02 17:12:38 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
George Knight <george_  2008-07-02 17:12:37 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Uncle Fuzzy <james.d.w  2008-07-02 11:35:18 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-07-02 18:57:36 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Uncle Fuzzy <james.d.w  2008-07-02 11:40:37 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
George Knight <george_  2008-07-02 17:12:38 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
unclhank@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-30 05:34:17 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
DP <dpiotro@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-30 12:54:17 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Brad <apispilot@[EMAIL  2008-06-30 13:08:31 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Ian <ian.groups@[EMAIL  2008-06-30 23:44:54 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
sparkasw27@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-01 19:29:53 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-07-01 21:26:26 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-07-03 17:27:33 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Tony Verhulst <no@[EMA  2008-07-03 19:41:47 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-07-04 03:27:31 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-07-04 03:27:31 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
sisu1a <paul@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-03 17:06:06 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Tony Verhulst <no@[EMA  2008-07-03 22:14:53 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
sisu1a <paul@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-03 22:02:35 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"kirk.stant" &l  2008-07-04 06:00:33 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
tknauff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-04 15:10:54 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-07-04 18:56:24 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-07-05 15:27:26 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Andy <a.durbin@[EMAIL   2008-07-05 06:33:34 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Wayne Paul" &l  2008-07-05 08:20:16 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-07-05 08:30:56 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Frank Whiteley <frank.  2008-07-05 07:54:16 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Brian <brianfcase@[EMA  2008-07-05 16:26:10 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Andy <a.durbin@[EMAIL   2008-07-02 16:22:09 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-07-02 19:02:36 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-07-02 18:13:30 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Martin Gregorie <marti  2008-07-03 16:20:08 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-07-03 21:21:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 19:44:27 CST 2008.