Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Sailplanes, hanggliders > Re: Tom Knauff'...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 47 of 52 Topic 7724 of 8401
Post > Topic >>

Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter

by Brian <brianfcase@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 5, 2008 at 04:26 PM

A few years ago I spent the good ****tion of an afternoon reviewing
NTSB accidents for GA (single engine) aircraft. As has already been
mentioned the find the number of flight hours is the most difficult
and suspect but using the best number I thought I could find here is
what if found.

Actually what initated this project was the phrase "The most dangerous
part of flying is driving to the air****t" I wanted to see how true
this phrase was.

He is the summary as I recall it. Unfortunatly I didn't look into
glider accident and I suspect this would be very difficult to
determine the amount of hours flown.

I tried to compare how dangerous spending 1 hour in and Airplane was
compared to spending one hour in a Car or on a Motorcycle.

I determined that overall flying single engine aircraft was more
dangerous than driver hour for hour.

Overall Flying single engine was about equally dangerous to riding a
motorcycle. The point I make to my students is that on a motor cycle
the majority of accidents are not caused by the motorcyclist. Flying
accidents are usually caused by the pilot. So for flying you have a
lot more control over how dangerous it is.

If you eliminated cropdusters (and other intentional low flying) and
flight into IMC conditions then the flying is about equally dangerous
to driving

I dont recall if I did this based on Fatal accident (I think I did) or
on Fatailities or on just re****ted Accidents.

The issue is there are quite a few ways to measure at how dangerous it
is, and different measurement methods produce significantly different
results.

Wish I had good numbers for Soaring for an hour to hour comparison.

Brian
CFIIG/ASEL.
 




 52 Posts in Topic:
Tom Knauff's newsletter
pik20pilot@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-29 20:32:27 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Randy <rgteel@[EMAIL P  2008-06-30 00:42:30 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Ian <ian.groups@[EMAIL  2008-06-30 02:40:13 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
tknauff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-30 04:34:01 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Chris Reed <chris.reed  2008-06-30 15:13:43 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Jim Beckman <jamesbeck  2008-06-30 19:57:43 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-06-30 12:49:54 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-06-30 12:38:10 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-06-30 20:27:43 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Bob Whelan <rfwhelan@[  2008-06-30 16:31:42 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-06-30 23:57:44 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Brad <apispilot@[EMAIL  2008-06-30 17:39:50 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-06-30 19:04:20 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"bumper" <bu  2008-07-01 15:24:16 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-01 07:12:39 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Gary Emerson <emerson_  2008-07-01 06:43:46 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Soarin Again <shadowli  2008-07-01 13:57:40 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-07-01 08:08:03 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Mike Schumann"  2008-07-01 21:33:41 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
George Knight <george_  2008-07-02 17:12:38 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
George Knight <george_  2008-07-02 17:12:37 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Uncle Fuzzy <james.d.w  2008-07-02 11:35:18 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-07-02 18:57:36 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Uncle Fuzzy <james.d.w  2008-07-02 11:40:37 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
George Knight <george_  2008-07-02 17:12:38 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
unclhank@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-30 05:34:17 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
DP <dpiotro@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-30 12:54:17 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Brad <apispilot@[EMAIL  2008-06-30 13:08:31 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Ian <ian.groups@[EMAIL  2008-06-30 23:44:54 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
sparkasw27@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-01 19:29:53 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-07-01 21:26:26 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-07-03 17:27:33 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Tony Verhulst <no@[EMA  2008-07-03 19:41:47 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-07-04 03:27:31 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-07-04 03:27:31 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
sisu1a <paul@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-03 17:06:06 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Tony Verhulst <no@[EMA  2008-07-03 22:14:53 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
sisu1a <paul@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-03 22:02:35 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"kirk.stant" &l  2008-07-04 06:00:33 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
tknauff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-04 15:10:54 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-07-04 18:56:24 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Nyal Williams <nyalwil  2008-07-05 15:27:26 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Andy <a.durbin@[EMAIL   2008-07-05 06:33:34 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Wayne Paul" &l  2008-07-05 08:20:16 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-07-05 08:30:56 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Frank Whiteley <frank.  2008-07-05 07:54:16 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Brian <brianfcase@[EMA  2008-07-05 16:26:10 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Andy <a.durbin@[EMAIL   2008-07-02 16:22:09 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-07-02 19:02:36 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
"Bill Daniels"   2008-07-02 18:13:30 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Martin Gregorie <marti  2008-07-03 16:20:08 
Re: Tom Knauff's newsletter
Jim Logajan <JamesL@[E  2008-07-03 21:21:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 14:15:50 CST 2008.