On Jul 5, 9:21=A0pm, "COLIN LAMB" <k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> One problem with a transmit every minute, rather than 10 minutes, would
b=
e
> that it would shorten battery life considerably. =A0I am guessing it
woul=
d
> approximate 10% of the present battery life. =A0The 300 hours of
transmit
> quoted would be reduced to 30 hours.
>
> Also, with transmissions every minute, the processing through the
satelli=
te
> might be overloaded with present equipment, which would require more
mone=
y
> to correct - hence higher user fees.
>
> The external antenna would reduce reliability considerably, and may not
g=
ain
> much. =A0The exposure to a satellite from a sailplane would be very
high,=
so
> the most reliable and simplest antenna should work well.
>
> Colin Lamb
If they respin the packaging in future it would be pretty easy to fit
4 x Lithium AA cells inside the current packaging volume that only
holds 2 x Lithium AA cells.
I suspect the largest reasons things are as they are are likely not
techncial - it seems like marketing decisions targeted at an intended
user base of hikers etc.
A large issue with external power is maintaining a well sealed
packaging and SPOT wanted to claim good specs/complaince for water
resistance/sealing and how many hikers carry around 12 volt power?
I also suspect no external power and also the need to reset tracking
every 24 hours was in part, or in large, to prevent cannibalization of
exiting parts of the asset tracking market that Globalstar (who own
SPOT) services.
=2E.. but folks don't put of buying a SPOT now if you want one, just
becasue something better might be coming some time in the future.
Darryl
|
