Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Sailplanes, hanggliders > Re: Ka-6 TE Pro...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 15 of 15 Topic 8036 of 8401
Post > Topic >>

Re: Ka-6 TE Probe

by Neal Pfeiffer <nealpfeiffer@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 29, 2008 at 09:17 PM

The fin is not the only location for good compensation.

A total energy probe works best when the flow p***** by it at nearly the 
same angle and at nearly freestream static pressure for the range of 
speeds of interest.

Mounting in front of the fin puts the probe in a location that is close 
to the freestream static pressure.  The flow angularity may vary some 
amount, but the combination of glider angle of attack and the downwash 
field of the wing will tend to reduce the overall variation in flow 
angle.  Changing flap position will induce a step change in flow angle, 
but again this is not too large.

Mounting the probe on the top of the fuselage a little aft of the wing 
again puts the probe in a region that is close to freestream static 
pressure and the straightening effect of the wing and fuselage produce 
only a very small change in the flow angle at the probe.

Now, what about the forward fuselage?  For a Ka6, the static buttons are 
on the side of the fuselage at the bulkhead ahead of the instrument 
panel, where they register near the freestream static value for the 
thermaling and cruise conditions.  On the top of the forward fuselage, 
the canopy will slow the flow at its base, producing higher than 
freestream static pressure, and then rapidly accelerate the flow as it 
moves up and over the curved ****tion of the canopy, thus producing a 
lower than freestream pressure.  By placing the probe at the bulkhead 
ahead of the panel, it is enough ahead of the canopy disturbance to have 
a pressure value that is close to freestream, but possibly with more 
variability than for the other two locations mentioned above.  The pitch 
flow angularity is pretty constant though.  For the Ka6 with the speeds 
mostly between 40 to 70 knots, the forward position is reasonable.

...... Neal


unclhank@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

>>
>>- Show quoted text -
> 
> 
>  If objective is just simple installation, do what JJ says and put it
> on the nose.
> Putting it anywhere close to the flow field of the wing- that is
> anywhere near the top, means that the local pressure
> changes every time you change angle of attack.  This is the reason why
> it is on the fin on essentially all modern gliders.
> UH
 




 15 Posts in Topic:
Ka-6 TE Probe
vontresc <vontresc@[EM  2008-08-28 09:24:01 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
Darryl Ramm <darryl.ra  2008-08-28 09:50:53 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
Marc Ramsey <marc@[EMA  2008-08-28 10:00:32 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
Eric Greenwell <flyguy  2008-08-28 17:23:28 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
Eric Greenwell <flyguy  2008-08-28 17:25:49 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
Darryl Ramm <darryl.ra  2008-08-28 10:18:00 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
Marc Ramsey <marc@[EMA  2008-08-28 10:26:52 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
unclhank@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-08-28 10:33:04 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
Marc Ramsey <marc@[EMA  2008-08-28 11:10:00 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
"Wayne Paul" &l  2008-08-28 14:25:17 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
JJ Sinclair <john.sinc  2008-08-28 11:02:02 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
Neal Pfeiffer <nealpfe  2008-08-28 18:05:44 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
BB <john.cochrane@[EMA  2008-08-28 11:49:19 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
unclhank@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-08-29 12:50:02 
Re: Ka-6 TE Probe
Neal Pfeiffer <nealpfe  2008-08-29 21:17:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 14:01:32 CST 2008.