Re: Bertie's Sup****ters and Sockpuppets - Vol 3

Juan Tootreego <123go!@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:MPG.22d7ff35c177281298b153@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> In article <g4kd64$pir$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Flash says... 
> 
>> 
>> "Maxwell" <luv2^fly99@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:jwgbk.12565$rH1.6915@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > "Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> > message news:FDebk.75167$gc5.59345@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >> Oh for crying out loud...  Live with it...  Or leave...  All
>> >> you're doing with this nonsense is sponsoring another endless
>> >> thread of more off-topic crap.  Get a life!!
>> >
>> > You're the one that need to get a clue Frank,  you're the one
>> > sup****ting the maker of all this ****.
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> Maxie,
>> 
>> I very seldom interfere in somebody's private passions, be they
>> flame-war or wild rant.  BUT, that having been said,  I quote your
>> first post of this thread:
>> 
>> ><>><>problem, or part of the solution. If you guy insist on
>> >><>><>welcoming the asshole, he will always be around.
>> 
>> ><>><>A vote for Bertie is a vote for filth,
>> 
>> And look at the last of your previous post, above.
>> 
>> Seems that the filth is from YOUR keyboard, and since civil discourse
>> is is not what you have rendered, it must be that it is not which you
>> desire. You rather give up any claim you may have for decrying
>> "filth". 
> 
> "All books can be indecent books
>  Though recent books are bolder,
>  For filth (I'm glad to say) is in
>  the mind of the beholder."


But are Maxie's poasts utterly without redeeming social improtance?



Bertie