Re: 757 avionics

On 3 Okt, 18:31, Bertie the Bunyip <B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> parri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote in news:dd1b41a5-1df4-49ca-9895-e7325985c9e3
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On 3 Okt, 18:09, FriarTuck <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:19 +0000, Mike wrote:
> >> > "FriarTuck" <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> >news:E_qFk.4622$8T1.4572@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> some questions if anyone knows the answers...
>
> >> > A better question is...
>
> >> > Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
> >> > questions using different sock puppets?
>
> >> has it been asked and answered before?
>
> > The question as to whether the 757 is FBW or not certainly has been...
> > Why don't you ask them what diameter the turn Hanjour made was? Or try
> > and explain to them how it would have been impossible for him to have
> > flown it, even though you don't knwo what the diameter of the turn
> > was? Or how, if he had flown it, you feel he would have probably
> > entered a "graveyard turn" despite it being mid-morning on a CAVU
> > day?
>
> K00k alert!
>
> Bertie

Absolutely...