Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Aeronautics (aircraft design and construction) > Lift Coefficien...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1213 of 1291
Post > Topic >>

Lift Coefficient of swept wings

by Tom Sanderson <tdscanuck@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 12, 2006 at 05:46 PM

>> You're getting mixed up between lift and lift coefficient.  Forget the
>> second order effects...the area of a circular and rectangular plate is
>> different (assuming same max chord) so the lift is different.
>
>     The assumption was the same area, hence the span and/or max chord
> must be different.  Let's assume the same chord and that the max chord
> is lower on the rectangular plate.

OK, that makes a difference.  For equal area, I suspect the circular plate

actually has higher lift coefficient (and lift) because it concentrates
its 
area near the center where the downdraft isn't as bad...it's closer to
being 
an ideal elliptic wing than the square plate.  I did some quick digging on

the web and my reference books and didn't find this though, so I could be 
wrong.  I'm sure the Cl of a square plate and a circular plate have been 
tested and do***ented somewhere.

>     That's the point I was trying to make...how does the airflow
> "know" where the chord is?  All it "knows" is the angle between itself
> and the leading edge.  (And I think we are agreeing that that
> shouldn't make a difference...)

The airflow doesn't know or care where the chord is.  However, the wing 
does.  The wing only generates lift from chordwise flow.  As you sweep the

wing, the chord sweeps with it.  Therefore the chordwise airflow drops and

the spanwise airflow increases.  Since the wing can't "see" the spanwise 
airflow it generates lift like an unswept wing flying at a lower speed 
(ignoring other sweep effects, like dutch roll).

You can look at it a whole different way and get the same result.  If you 
define the chord as being parallel to the airflow, then as you sweep the 
wing the chord increases and the airfoil section that the air sees gets 
longer and thinner.  Long and thin airfoils generate less left than short 
fat ones (all other things being equal).

>From the wings' point of view, sweeping drops the airflow velocity.  From

the air's point of view, sweeping makes the wing shorter and the airfoil 
longer and thinner (finer).  Either way, the lift goes down.

I agree that the angle between the freestream the leading edge doesn't
make 
a difference, as far as this discussion goes.

Tom.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Lift Coefficient of swept wings
Tom Sanderson <tdscanu  2006-06-12 17:46:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 8:50:50 CST 2008.