Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Aeronautics (aircraft design and construction) > The wrong "Bern...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1223 of 1291
Post > Topic >>

The wrong "Bernoulli" explanation in Sci. American for April 2005

by WaltBJ <waltbj01@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 26, 2006 at 11:33 AM

Symmetrical airfoils will not generate lift if the angle of attack is
zero. The F104 has a symmetrical airfoil and cruises at about 3 degrees
positive AOA. Similarly, constant altitude inverted flight is possible
only if the airfoil has a positive angle of attack relative to the
earth. Lots of forward stick, in other words. In knife flight, the
fuselage is yawed so it has a positive angle of attack and is
generating lift and it is usually symmetrical, too. The slab-sided F4
flew fine on its side at 500 KIAS. As for the 'true' explanation of
lift, any time you have to juggle four simultaneous differential
equations, pilot instruction becomes very unwieldy and the students
doze off. This approach, to me, is picking nits.

Walt BJ.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
The wrong "Bernoulli" explanation in Sci. American for April 200
WaltBJ <waltbj01@[EMAI  2006-07-26 11:33:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Sep 8 11:18:17 CDT 2008.