Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Aeronautics (aircraft design and construction) > The wrong "Bern...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1247 of 1291
Post > Topic >>

The wrong "Bernoulli" explanation in Sci. American for April 2005

by Tom Sanderson <tdscanuck@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 23, 2006 at 11:05 AM

> All new airliners of Airbus or Boeing make and all top bizjets, have
> low drag "supercritical wings", with almost flat upper surface and
> curved lower surface (to host wing beam and fuel)!
>
> I have never seen Scientific American explain that wing and why it
> physically create Lift!

A supercritical wing is, by definition, designed to operate in a 
compressible flow regime.  You can throw Bernoulli out the window for such

wings.

They still generate lift the same way as all other wings; they induce a 
circulation in the airflow.  They have a "fat" shape to control adverse 
transonic effects and prevent shock separation on the upper surface from 
occuring too far forward.

As a side benefit, you can fit more fuel in there and use deeper chords,
but 
it's not strictly necessary...the 747 doesn't have a supercritical wing
and 
does just fine.

Tom.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
The wrong "Bernoulli" explanation in Sci. American for April 200
Tom Sanderson <tdscanu  2006-08-23 11:05:27 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 9:16:52 CST 2008.