Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Aeronautics (aircraft design and construction) > The wrong "Bern...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1250 of 1291
Post > Topic >>

The wrong "Bernoulli" explanation in Sci. American for April 2005

by stauffer@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Oct 10, 2006 at 02:09 PM

> > All new airliners of Airbus or Boeing make and all top bizjets, have
> > low drag "supercritical wings", with almost flat upper surface and
> > curved lower surface (to host wing beam and fuel)!
> >
> > I have never seen Scientific American explain that wing and why it
> > physically create Lift!
>
> A supercritical wing is, by definition, designed to operate in a
> compressible flow regime.  You can throw Bernoulli out the window for
such
> wings.
>
> They still generate lift the same way as all other wings; they induce a
> circulation in the airflow.  They have a "fat" shape to control adverse
> transonic effects and prevent shock separation on the upper surface from
> occuring too far forward.


Keep in mind that the air is not constrained to follow the surface
contour perfectly.  Smoke tunnel test photos are very revealing.  The
airflow once you get a fair fraction of the chord away from the surface
begins to look the same on almost any airfoil generating lift.

To use Bernoulli's law, you must use it in small local regions, then
integrate the pressures completely around the foil.

All camber does is ****ft the lift vs aoa curve right or left, not up
and down.  A flat plate generates lift, so do reverse cambered
airfoils.  But they do so over different ranges of AOA, and the PEAK
lift coefficient will differ from airfoil to airfoil.  At lower AOA,
all airfoils generally have the same change in Cl per change in angle.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
The wrong "Bernoulli" explanation in Sci. American for April 200
stauffer@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2006-10-10 14:09:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Oct 14 5:15:16 CDT 2008.