Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Aviation > Aeronautics (aircraft design and construction) > The wrong "Bern...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1262 of 1291
Post > Topic >>

The wrong "Bernoulli" explanation in Sci. American for April 2005

by Tom Sanderson <tdscanuck@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 11, 2006 at 10:14 AM

> Flowwise Circulation is a pure mathematical model, for correcting the
> Potential flow field!
>
> Itīs very easy to see that in real flight there is no flowwise
> circulation around the wing, only the spanwise circulation in
> connection with the downwash!

What do you call air moving in circles?  Most people call it circulation.

In real flight there is flowwise circulation above and below the
wing...not 
around it.

>> As a side benefit, you can fit more fuel in there and use deeper
chords, 
>> but
>> it's not strictly necessary...the 747 doesn't have a supercritical wing

>> and
>> does just fine.
>
> Because the "old" B747-400 does not have the new supercritical wing,
> itīs draglosses is some 15-20 % higher than the new 787.

The 747-400 is more than 15-20% larger than the 787...of course its drag 
losses are higher.

Tom.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
The wrong "Bernoulli" explanation in Sci. American for April 200
Tom Sanderson <tdscanu  2006-12-11 10:14:35 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 9:24:49 CST 2008.